Offline
It gets crazier by the day!
Personally I would rather see(hope) the Pac-12 could expand before teams start leaving.
I would not like Oregon going to the Little Ten for more reasons than I want to share here, but without question it is "open season" on conference realignment.
Offline
DucksReign wrote:
It gets crazier by the day!
Personally I would rather see(hope) the Pac-12 could expand before teams start leaving.
I would not like Oregon going to the Little Ten for more reasons than I want to share here, but without question it is "open season" on conference realignment.
That is just insane. I guess money is all that matters. I'm losing interest daily.
Offline
John McClain, a respected reporter out of TN, just floated a desire to see KU, Baylor, TT, and TCU join Colorado, Utah, and the AZ schools in a PAC-16 East Division.
I would like to see us grab Boise State, UNLV, KU, and TCU, but I doubt that happens. We would add a great basketball blur blood and markets in Boise, Dallas-Ft. Worth, and Vegas, where we should move the PAC headquarters anyway...
Offline
The whole sport right now is migrating from a college past time into a pro league complete with NILs, free agency and TV contracts. If for any reason an athletic department in these super conferences ever claim to operate at a loss from this time forward, I will be stunned. I am even to the point where I would expect that athletic departments become divorced from university business and funding, the only thing tying them together anymore being a logo and the expectation that these student-athletes attend and pass classes. I think I have officially hit geezer status...
Offline
Jiffy Jeff wrote:
The whole sport right now is migrating from a college past time into a pro league complete with NILs, free agency and TV contracts. If for any reason an athletic department in these super conferences ever claim to operate at a loss from this time forward, I will be stunned. I am even to the point where I would expect that athletic departments become divorced from university business and funding, the only thing tying them together anymore being a logo and the expectation that these student-athletes attend and pass classes. I think I have officially hit geezer status...
Welcome to my world ..This geezer agrees with you on divorcing athletics from Colleges, at least football. Let the NFL pay the bills.
Offline
1) USC being a private school(ditto on Stanford) probably has the most flexibility financially of choosing a conference.
2) One issue in all of this is whether it is for football only(85% of college sports revenue) or all sports? The Pac-12 right now doesn't need any "help" in being competitive nationally in any sport other than football.
3) I don't like the idea of going "down" a conference to expand but teams from the Mountain West make some sense. Boise State is a one-trick pony(football) and nobody recruits Idaho.
I would rather see Oregon play San Diego State in football than Rutgers(Little Ten).
If the Pac-12 wanted to keep a semblance of its geographical balance...if that is even important...then adding Colorado State and Utah State along with KU / KSU or TCU / Baylor(or TT) might work...them we have a lock on the major state colleges in Washington, Oregon, California, Arizona, Utah, Colorado, Kansas OR 2 good Texas colleges. We would own the western 1/3 of the USA!
The problem is adding CSU, Utah State and Kansas does nothing to upgrade football...Baylor / TCU / TT is better football-wise.
4) My intuition tells me any Pac-12 expansion is more or less a football decision. In that context then TCU, Baylor, TT and Oklahoma State seem the best choices.