Offline
Offline
Actually all of those take a back seat to what I want to see more than anything else... MASSIVELY IMPROVED IN-GAME COACHING... clock management; substitutions; TRUST the players you recruited to PLAY; DO NOT play down to the level of teams with lesser talent and experience; don't coach to a process but rather what is happening in front of you (if a QB is struggling then give someone else an opportunity)...in other words do the exact opposite of Cristobal! PLEASE AND THANK YOU!
Offline
I get frustrated with Zachary Neel's writing a lot of times but it's not a bad list. Totally agree with DR's list, though, I think those things are more important.
There's something that's not on either of those lists that is sorely missing. I want to see players actually getting better. I don't want our top 100 recruits to get drafted in the sixth round, or later. I want to see talent developed and, you know, GET BETTER. I want to see top recruits coming to Oregon because they know the coaches are going to make them better and they'll have a better chance at an NFL career. I want to see some of our 3 star and all of our 4 star recruits getting drafted, and some of our four star kids in the top two rounds, and all of our five star recruits in the first round. That isn't going to happen in every case because the kid has to have the drive, and injuries happen, but it should happen a lot more than it has been.
I'm optimistic, at least on the defensive side, certainly Lanning filled up the draft with his defensive players this year. That suggests he knows how to develop them into better players than they were when they arrived.
Player development, to me, is maybe even more important than in-game coaching. Saban wins so many titles because all his players get better while they are at Alabama. He may have a lot of talent, but if he developed his talent as well as Mario did at Oregon, he'd hardly have any titles, even with good in-game coaching.
Offline
Agree with all of the above and will add this:
A sense of urgency.
After the Buckeye win last year, the Ducks were the hottest team in the country. And all of that equity evaporated and was forgotten after two nationally televised beatdowns by Utah and a nothing bowl appearance. The brand is tarnished to a degree, thankfully not damaged...
Also, the cupboard is full. There is enough talent still in Eugene and coming in this Fall to win and win now. I thiink a division title, a conference title and a NY6 bowl appearnace is a lot to ask, but right now the Ducks need all the leverage they can muster up in the short term as the college football world evolves at light speed these next two years. UW is in the same situation, but they are not yet at the same level as the Ducks are in terms of talent and immediate potential.
Offline
Jiffy Jeff wrote:
Agree with all of the above and will add this:
A sense of urgency.
After the Buckeye win last year, the Ducks were the hottest team in the country. And all of that equity evaporated and was forgotten after two nationally televised beatdowns by Utah and a nothing bowl appearance. The brand is tarnished to a degree, thankfully not damaged...
Also, the cupboard is full. There is enough talent still in Eugene and coming in this Fall to win and win now. I thiink a division title, a conference title and a NY6 bowl appearnace is a lot to ask, but right now the Ducks need all the leverage they can muster up in the short term as the college football world evolves at light speed these next two years. UW is in the same situation, but they are not yet at the same level as the Ducks are in terms of talent and immediate potential.
I agree. There is a lot of talent right now, and more coming. I too do not think a NY6 bowl is out of the question. I feel we should be able to win the north, and maybe the conference. A tough OOC schedule. Would be amazing to go 3-0, but at least 2-1. Go Ducks!
Offline
Excellent points about coaching up players and sense of urgency.
One key change to remember re Conference Championship...winning the Division guarantees you nothing. It is the 2 teams with the best records.
Therefore the standard is actually less complicated for every team...you need to have one of the two best records to play for the Pac-12 title.
What we don't want is a competitive/balanced North Division where teams beat each other up.
Right now I don't think Oregon is one of the two best teams not because of a lack of talent but for 2 key reasons...
1) Lanning is the least experienced head coach in the Pac-12.
2) The players responsible for 52 of Oregon's 56 TD's last season are no longer on the team and I am not sure yet where those 50-some TD's will come from this season.
Obviously my concerns could be the "smartest guy in the room" or "completely irrelevant" and everything in between depending on what transpires.
Last edited by DucksReign (7/25/2022 12:44 pm)
Offline
DucksReign wrote:
1) Lanning is the least experienced head coach in the Pac-12.
2) The players responsible for 52 of Oregon's 56 TD's last season are no longer on the team and I am not sure yet where those 50-some TD's will come from this season.
Agree with the first. Not particularly concerned about the second, we have loads of talent at the skill positions.
I think our RBs will be productive. I really like our receivers. I think we have at least 2 and maybe 3 QBs that are all going to be better than AB was last year.
I also think that Lanning's lack of HC experience is unlikely to significantly impact our defense, and that if we stay reasonably healthy on defense, the D is likely to produce a few scores and some short fields that make it a lot easier for the offense to find the end zone. And of course, if we get a lead, the D can often play even more aggressively and wreak even more havoc.
But the biggest gamble is at OC. It could prove to be the most brilliant hire of the off-season -- or the biggest dud. If the former, there's definitely the talent to put a lot of points on the board. We shall see.
Offline
Here is the deal with Dillingham...he has never been THE play caller as an OC. Malzahn called the plays at Auburn and at FSU it was a "collaborative effort."
You simply don't lose a Travis Dye and replicate those results with someone who has little to no experience.
Seems like there is a lot of preseason hype based on coaches and players with limited experiences and results. Bo Nix didn't exactly tear up the SEC
last season and of course we all know what happened to Oregon's backup QB's.
Oregon as does USC and uw will have an advantage right at the start as in no game film. By the time Conference play begins in earnest there will be game film and we find out who can best make adjustments (a concept completely void in Cristobal's "process" approach). It is going to be interesting.
Last edited by DucksReign (7/26/2022 12:01 pm)
Offline
I'm late to the party and I'm not sure I have much relevant material to add after so many great points.
When you have a new coaching staff and QB things are really hard to predict.
From the get and go I've been uneasy with Dillingham's fairly unproven career so far. He's saying the right things and getting the players to believe in his system so I do at least have some optimism. Some coaches do their best coaching early on so it's not a given the inexperience will translate to not being able to make in game adjustments.
I agree with DITM about feeling good about RB and other skill positions on offense.
Same with defense except for injury concerns. I'm not sure if it's been said already, but anything the conditioning program can do to reduce injuries would be huge since there's been far too many recently.
It's nice to be thinking about the season ahead for a change instead of the conference realignment.
Game time is only 5 weeks away from this Saturday! Go Ducks!
Offline
DucksReign wrote:
You simply don't lose a Travis Dye and replicate those results with someone who has little to no experience.
Mar'Keise Irving. Great year for a freshman. Barely played in five games (mostly at the start of the season), still got 699 yards. 80 against a great Iowa defense. He wasn't Travis Dye but neither was Travis his freshman (or sophomore) year. Will he be as good as Travis? No idea but he does not have "little to no experience," he ran for 700 yards in the Big Ten. If the other RBs can keep him on the bench it's because they are playing pretty well.
I'm not particularly concerned about RB. We'll get good enough production there if we have an OC who can call plays and make adjustments. Totally agree with your concerns on THAT point. But these guys are all good enough to make yards and score TDs if given the ball in places where they can do something with it.
As for Nix, there's good Bo and bad Bo. We'll get enough good Bo to win quite a few games, but almost certainly enough bad Bo to keep us out of a playoff run. Still hoping Ty can finally put it together and sit Bo on the bench.