Crap, there goes the shutout. Really can't let that happen. Bad news for the Buffs is Oregon offense back on the field.

GEORGIA GAME SPOILER ALERT

how bizarre would it be if the game ended with the same score as the Georgia-Oregon game?

WoodburnDuck wrote:

GEORGIA GAME SPOILER ALERT

how bizarre would it be if the game ended with the same score as the Georgia-Oregon game?

Man, Dawgs are kickin butt. Good to see for us, imo
 

oldretiredguy wrote:

Nice stop by the D...tough day for kicking FG...let's go get another TD!!!

Your wish is their command.

On a side note: Folsom Field has to be the most beautiful setting for a football stadium in America.

Duckball wrote:

DurangoDuck wrote:

oldretiredguy wrote:

He was down, and is there targeting???

 
For all the crazy and questionable targeting calls this season, I can’t fathom how that wasn’t. Technically not leading by the crown, by he was flying like a heat seeking missile right at his head. This whole targeting issue needs revisiting imo. Way too many 1/10th second image reviews and penciling of the centimeters, without the aggressive moves. Either let them play (as they did here), or call everything.

Really?
I don't think in any universe that was targeting.
This IS still the game of football isn't it?
 

 
Didn’t think it was. My point being I’ve seen so many BS targeting calls on hits that were not dangerous for the ball carrier, last being a “crown” but to the shoulder pad that was called. Not less egregious as this non-call, but that one was.  Bassa is returning 2nd half from a targeting call that was to the defenders back.  I would rather get rid of targeting all-together except for blatant ones.

DurangoDuck wrote:

Duckball wrote:

DurangoDuck wrote:

 
For all the crazy and questionable targeting calls this season, I can’t fathom how that wasn’t. Technically not leading by the crown, by he was flying like a heat seeking missile right at his head. This whole targeting issue needs revisiting imo. Way too many 1/10th second image reviews and penciling of the centimeters, without the aggressive moves. Either let them play (as they did here), or call everything.

Really?
I don't think in any universe that was targeting.
This IS still the game of football isn't it?
 

 
Didn’t think it was. My point being I’ve seen so many BS targeting calls on hits that were not dangerous for the ball carrier, last being a “crown” but to the shoulder pad that was called. Not less egregious as this non-call, but that one was. Bassa is returning 2nd half from a targeting call that was to the defenders back. I would rather get rid of targeting all-together except for blatant ones.

Absolutely and un-equivalently yes!

Couldn't agree more. This is a horrible rule and should only be called when it is blatantly obvious. And I think every football fan knows immediately when it's obvious.

I'm so sick of defenders not getting to play football anymore. This includes pass interference.